<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Swift Kick to the IPv6 Backside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john-savageau.com/2009/11/12/a-swift-kick-to-the-ipv6-backside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/11/12/a-swift-kick-to-the-ipv6-backside/</link>
	<description>Telecom, Internet, Technololgy, Communications, and Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsavageau</title>
		<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/11/12/a-swift-kick-to-the-ipv6-backside/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnsavageau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsavageau.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/a-swift-kick-to-the-ipv6-backside/#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No argument on protecting identities - it would also bring us one step closer to being hybrids.  All points well taken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument on protecting identities &#8211; it would also bring us one step closer to being hybrids.  All points well taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latif Ladid</title>
		<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/11/12/a-swift-kick-to-the-ipv6-backside/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[latif Ladid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsavageau.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/a-swift-kick-to-the-ipv6-backside/#comment-293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John,

Everything you say is correct with one single item we should avoid is to make a v6 address as your social security ID. the IPv6 prefix belongs to your ISP and not to you, so it will never be a permanent life-time identifier. For privacy purposes, I won&#039;t also vouch for it. IPv6 will even give you more privacy when using the IP address randomizer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Everything you say is correct with one single item we should avoid is to make a v6 address as your social security ID. the IPv6 prefix belongs to your ISP and not to you, so it will never be a permanent life-time identifier. For privacy purposes, I won&#8217;t also vouch for it. IPv6 will even give you more privacy when using the IP address randomizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

