<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telecom Risk and Security Part 3 – Human Factors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://john-savageau.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/</link>
	<description>Telecom, Internet, Technololgy, Communications, and Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 02:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mac Auley</title>
		<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Mac Auley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsavageau.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/#comment-225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This issue is one that is near and dear to my heart, only a couple of rungs up the IT stack.

I worked for a now defunct company that had a solution ahead of its time, which would mitigate the insider threat on a network. It did this by issuing a &#039;key&#039; to every machine that had access to the network. 

Guests had no key, and by extension, and policy, had little access to network resources. No key = no locks get opened and in many cases as an ancillary function, you couldn&#039;t even see the door. It was akin to walking into a hotel and the lobby was the door to your room. 

You knew there were hundreds of other rooms in the hotel, you couldn&#039;t even see them, let alone try your key in any other door. Five years ago, people thought it was &#039;cool&#039; technology, but there hadn&#039;t been enough damage, and enough quantifiable damage to implement it. 

The point was that the threats are from insiders, and anything you can do to limit their access on a network is the right thing to do. 

We did not focus on the physical security piece, but as you point out - insiders have access to more than we think about in our buildings and on our networks. 

My fear is that it will take something catastrophic to happen, and those of us in the IT world will continue to be reactive vs proactive and adding true value to the organizations we are tasked with supporting. Great suggestions/best practices. They are simple, executeable, and effective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue is one that is near and dear to my heart, only a couple of rungs up the IT stack.</p>
<p>I worked for a now defunct company that had a solution ahead of its time, which would mitigate the insider threat on a network. It did this by issuing a &#8216;key&#8217; to every machine that had access to the network. </p>
<p>Guests had no key, and by extension, and policy, had little access to network resources. No key = no locks get opened and in many cases as an ancillary function, you couldn&#8217;t even see the door. It was akin to walking into a hotel and the lobby was the door to your room. </p>
<p>You knew there were hundreds of other rooms in the hotel, you couldn&#8217;t even see them, let alone try your key in any other door. Five years ago, people thought it was &#8216;cool&#8217; technology, but there hadn&#8217;t been enough damage, and enough quantifiable damage to implement it. </p>
<p>The point was that the threats are from insiders, and anything you can do to limit their access on a network is the right thing to do. </p>
<p>We did not focus on the physical security piece, but as you point out &#8211; insiders have access to more than we think about in our buildings and on our networks. </p>
<p>My fear is that it will take something catastrophic to happen, and those of us in the IT world will continue to be reactive vs proactive and adding true value to the organizations we are tasked with supporting. Great suggestions/best practices. They are simple, executeable, and effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsavageau</title>
		<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnsavageau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 01:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsavageau.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/#comment-224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I sincerely hope we can enlighten the community to force change in our infrastructure management.  

I am never a fan of govt oversight and over regulation, but I am also a fan of best practices and minimum standards, of which we have serious shortfalls in the US telecom infrastructure.

Thanks for the comment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sincerely hope we can enlighten the community to force change in our infrastructure management.  </p>
<p>I am never a fan of govt oversight and over regulation, but I am also a fan of best practices and minimum standards, of which we have serious shortfalls in the US telecom infrastructure.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Fonow</title>
		<link>http://john-savageau.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Fonow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnsavageau.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/telecom-risk-and-security-part-3-%e2%80%93-human-factors/#comment-223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good turnaround managers live by this mantra:

&quot;The situation is worse than it seems.  The situation will deteriorate&quot;.

from &quot;Taking Charge&quot;, John O. Whitney.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good turnaround managers live by this mantra:</p>
<p>&#8220;The situation is worse than it seems.  The situation will deteriorate&#8221;.</p>
<p>from &#8220;Taking Charge&#8221;, John O. Whitney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

